(Upload on July 21 2025) [ 日本語 | English ]
Mount Usu / Sarobetsu post-mined peatland
From left: Crater basin in 1986 and 2006. Cottongrass / Daylily
HOME > Lecture catalog / Research summary > Glossary > Interspecific interaction
Interspecific interaction (異種個体間相互作用)Interrelationships between populations
predation (捕食) (+/-) mutualism (双利共生) (+/+), commensalism (片利共生) (+/0) Antagonism (拮抗作用)Parasitism (寄生)[+ parasite, – host]Adelphoparasite (同種寄生): a parasite that is closely related to its host (e.g., both placed in the same family) Ectoparasite [+, -], external paratisism (外部寄生): a parasite living on the outside of its hosthaustorium (pl. -a, 吸器): that protion of a parasite that penetrates host cells and absorbs nutrients Endoparasite [+, -], internal paratisism (内部寄生): a parasite living within the hostDef. Parasitic plant (寄生植物): a plant that derives some or all of its nutritional requirements from another living plant, known as the host, by haustoria
Symbiosis (共生) (+, + or +, 0)Def. long-term biological interaction between two different species, where at least one organism benefitsMutualism: both species benefit Ex. pollinators and flowering plants Commensalism: one benefits, the other is unaffected Ex. barnacles on whales Indexces of interspecific interaction
(Armas et al. 2004) RIIBw = Bo + ΔBF - ΔBC
Bw: biomass observed by the target plant grown with other plants |
Bo: biomass potentially achieved without species interactions ΔBFC: observed biomass change = absolute effect of the interaction ∴ Bw - Bo = ΔBFC-Bo ≤ ΔBFC ≤ +∞ ΔBFC/Bw = ΔBFC/(ΔBFC + Bo)if only facilitation occurs, ΔBFC ranges from 0 to 1 |ΔBFC| ≤ |ΔBFC + Bo|
if only competition occurs, ΔBFC is negative but the above equation may not be true, as the index has an unlimited range [-∞ 0]
= ΔBFC/(ΔBFC + 2Bo) Habitat segregation (棲み分け)≡ two or more related species or populations use different habitats
Closely related species can coexist by avoiding competition through habitat segregation and dietary partitioning b. Interpopulation interactions c. Limitations or barriers to movement Trophic segregation (食い分け) ≡ co‑occurring species reduce competition by using different portions of the available food resources
by consuming different prey types, prey sizes and/or foraging in different microhabitats |
Natural enemy (天敵)k(N): ratre of predation - number of preys ingested by a predator in a given timeN: population density of prey
1. k(N) = kN: Lotka-Volterra what equation (1-3) is apporpriate is determined by the prey-predator interaction
1. dN/dt = r(1 – N/k)n – k(N)Y___(k(N) = kN same with capturing) ______________A______B
A: assuming that the number of individuals follows logistic growth
p > p*: extinction
__(a)_______________(b)_________________(c)
(a) two stable systems exist Predator-prey interactions (食う-食われる関係)Exp. Gause (1934) Paramecium caudatum, as a prey, in a test tube
vs Didinium nasutum, as the predator ⇒ Didinium starved to death without Paramecium extinction Defense strategy (防衛戦略)1974 Edmunds: classifed primary and secondary defensesPrimary defense (indirect defense)before a predator attacks its prey or defense with or without its predator= preventing detection or identification seclusion (隠遁) Ex. earthworm, nocturnal insects during daytime
disadvantages: decrease in the chances of reproduction and feeding + combined with secondary defense camouflage (偽装) making animals or objects hard to see1904 di Cesnola AP: Mantis religiosa - cryptic coloration
mantis plant green brown 18 day later (survived/prepared)
9 ggs buried at 50 cm intervals (3 replications) - 24/27 eaten by crow → adjustment of population density warning Ex. aposematism (警告色)
predator must learn the unfavorable preys
learning and conditioning of predtor + Ex. Plant: Foxglove = glaring flower + poison 1921 Carpenter GDH: feed the monkeys various insects (lab-experiment)220 glaring species - fed 20% vs 155 discreet species - 73% 1972 Benson: Heliconius erato (red postman)
developing unpalatability and protective coloration Ecological function Mimicry is adaptive because it:
reduces predation (Ex. Batesian, Müllerian mimicry) Ex. Vespa (hornets) and Vespula (wasps) develping yellow and black stripes for most species Def. Batesian mimicry (ベーツ型擬態): a harmless species is protected from predators by its resemblance to a harmful or inedible speciesprerequisite: present harmful or inedible species (model) |
mimics is extinct when the model is extinct
upper limit: mimics can not be dominant - predator will learn
not distinguish Ennomos alniaria (prey) and branches 1969 Brower et al.: Danaus plexippus - infraspecific mimicry
becoming bad taste when moths eat Asclepias humistrata and A. curassavica, due to cardenolides in Asclepias 1971 beetle (prey) - morphologically similar with ants predator (bird) - avoid feeding preys (beetles) when ants are together predator - feed insects excluded by ants collective defense (sometimes secondary defense)alliance defense (sometimes secondary defense) Secondary defense (direct defense)after a predator attacks its prey= chemical and morphological defenses, protect prey when attacked by predators
passive secondary defense - usual
running away to a hideout (1) developed barricade represented by protective hatch Ex. neck and head of turtle flight (flying behavior) (逃走): enhanced by two behaviors shown below,
protean: running in an uncertain and unpredictable way
lacks strong defences Ex. motion, stance, alarm signals
intimidation hypothesis: the preys intimidate predator by their own enemy which gives them time to flee away death feigning (擬死) deflection/diversion (陽動)1952 Simomns: Charadrius alexandrinus (Kentish plover) large terrestrial predator: found a chick or chicks
→ parent: quietly leaves → parent: ostentatious behavior generally developing high self-renewal capacity aggressive defense (counterattack)
poison, tusk, etc. Group defensemobbing: preys mob a predator by cooperative attack or harassingEx. herd of herbivores, defensive roundness heterogenous-species group, formed for the cooperation of preysEx. ant - prey(s): the prays need to make collaboration with the ants mimicry to ant (and living with the ant) Interspecific cooperationwith ant1963 Way: aphid-ant interaction to avoid the predator(s) Ex. Aphis favae - foraging more accompanied by ants (Lasius) the aphid forages even without the ant - facultative dependence Ex. Protrama - Saissetia zanzibarensis (coccid) honeydew removed by ant (die if not) - obligatory depencence 1945 Ford EB: Phengaris (Maculinea) arion
first-thrd instar larva - herbivorous feed on larvae - becoming carnivorous (= parasite) 1971 Hölldobler: Dinandra (rove beetle) - Formica sanguinearove beetle living adjacent to ant nest with echinoderm: evacuation site for preys1969 Dix TG: Evechinus chloroticus - Dellichthys morelandi with coelenterata: cnida used for cooperative defense 1966 Rees WJ: Gadus merlangus (cod)
facultative symbiosis with Cyanea lamarcki (jellyfish) Nomeus gronovii (man-of-war fish) - mimicry (opligatory dependent)
Ex. symbiosis between sea anemone and hermit crabCalliactis on Dardanus and Pagurus
Sea anemone: moved with crab - getting food symbiosis - initiated by the sea anemone 1969 Manardi, Rossi: Adamsia palliata - P. prideauxicrab: presence of behavioral order to replace sea anemone 1970 Ross: C. polypus always on D. gemmatussea anemone on the shell - navigated by the crab 1971 Ross: crab - sea anemone - octopus (predator) (lab-experiment)crab without sea anemone → eaten by octopus within 3 days |
|
Def. competition in which individuals of different species compete for the same resources in an ecosystem
⇔ Intraspecific competition: competition between members of the same species Intraspecific competition (種内競争)= intrapopulational-specific competitionInterspecific competition (種間競争)= interpopulational-sepcific competition |
Gause GF (1910-1986) Gause's axiom, theorem or law (ガウゼの定理)≡ competitive exclusion principle (競争排除則)= two species competing for the same limited resources do not coexist, viz. one species will inevitably outcompete and eliminate the other if their ecological niches are same or too similar |